Pew Research Center Analysis of Popular Science-Related Facebook Pages Finds Practical Use Tips and Ads Exceed Posts About Scientific Developments

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media contact: Tom Caiazza, 202-419-4372, tcaiazza@pewresearch.org Pew Research Center Analysis of Popular Science-Related Facebook Pages Finds Practical Use Tips and Ads Exceed Posts About Scientific Developments  WASHINGTON, D.C. (March 21, 2017) – In an effort to understand the kinds of science-related information people see on social media platforms, a Pew Research Center analysis of science-related pages on Facebook found that people are most likely to encounter practical, “news you can use” tips or advertisements rather than information about scientific discoveries. The Center analyzed a random sample of posts from 30 popular science-related Facebook pages over a six month period and found that about 3-in-10 posts (29%) featured new discoveries. Of the 6,582 posts studied during this time frame, 21% were “news you can use” and 16% were ads or promotions. The study looked at 30 of the most followed pages on Facebook with a self-described focus on science or a science-related domain. They were evenly split between established “multiplatform” organizations such as National Geographic and the Discovery Channel and “Facebook-primary” pages from organizations or individuals that have a large presence on the social media platform, but aren’t connected with any offline, legacy outlet such as IFLScience, ScienceAlert and the pages of Neil deGrasse Tyson and Bill Nye. While the posts covered a range of topics, the primary focus or “frame” of the posts across these pages were: New science discoveries: 29% Practical applications of science information, or “news you can use”: 21% Promotions or advertisements: 16% Explanations of science-related concepts: 12% Archived reposts: 7% Posts not related to science: 5% Other frames: 10% “Social media sites such as Facebook have become an important way for millions of people to encounter science-related information,” said Paul Hitlin, senior researcher at Pew Research Center and co-author of the report. “The analysis found that roughly three-in-ten posts on these popular science-related pages focused on new developments or discoveries. We also found that most of these pages specialize on one or two topics such as health or astronomy, rather than cover a wide range of issues. This study provides a rare look at the kinds of science and tech information people are exposed to on social media and as such, a window into information that could influence public views on issues connected with science.” Among the findings:     • The volume of posts from these science-related pages has increased in the last few years. Since 2014, these popular multiplatform sources have increased production of posts by 115% and the Facebook-primary sources have seen a 66% increase. • Facebook-primary accounts tend to have higher audience engagement than multiplatform accounts.By measuring the average number of user interactions per post – a common indicator of engagement – over a period between January 2014 and June 2017, the Facebook-primary pages averaged 14,730 interactions per post, while the multiplatform pages averaged 4,265 interactions. • There is considerable variation in topic and focus among these science-related Facebook pages.Most of these pages – whether multiplatform or Facebook-primary – focused their posts on one or two topics such as health and medicine or astronomy and physics. Only four of the 30 pages studied covered a roughly even share of posts on several topics with no one topic making up more than one-in-five posts. • Higher user engagement is more common for posts focused on visuals with little additional information and posts with calls to action. Visual posts (video or still images) with little or no text tend to yield more audience interactions than most other frames, on average. Additionally, posts with an explicit call to action or participation produced high average interactions, as did posts dealing with science funding issues, a topic of unique prominence during the study period, which occurred during the first six months of the Trump administration. Read the report: http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/21/the-science-people-see-on-social-media/  For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Tom Caiazza at tcaiazza@pewresearch.org or202-419-4372. Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. Subscribe to our daily and weekly email newsletters or follow us on ourFact Tank blog.

Recursos: Cómo hacer una investigación cualitativa. Recursos para triunfar con mi TFG o Tesis de Master

Para aquellos que estáis haciendo trabajos cualitativos, en caso de querer profundizar o consultar dudas sobre el desarrollo de la tesis, recomiendo el siguiente libro: "Cómo hacer investigación cualitativa. Fundamentos y metodología" que es descargable en el enlace que facilita la Universidad Nacional de La Plata [enlace al pdf].

Habilidades: Manual de Defensa para Tribunales de Tesis. Recursos para Triunfar en la Defensa de mi Tesis

En nuestra clase de hoy hemos visionado un video de empoderamiento para jóvenes que van a tener que hacer una defensa frente a un tribunal de tesis. Corresponde a la serie "Recursos para Triunfar con el Mínimo Esfuerzo en la Defensa de mi Tesis." Es una delicia, permite aprender sobre cómo presentar en público, cómo argumentar de forma científica... Lo único que cambiaría es la velocidad del discurso, ya que Kelly W. Brown habla muy deprisa, como corresponde a la energía de su edad.

¿Que mejoraríais o qué cambiaríais en el discurso de Kelly Brown? Lo comentarios están abiertos a las sugerencias. Muchas gracias.

Recursos: Cómo divulgar nuestra investigación

Cuatro realidades interrelacionadas están revolucionando hoy el modo en la ciencia de divulga y se difunde: El Blogging académico, la visibilidad y difusión de la investigación, las revistas digitales junto con la edición digital y la divulgación relacionada a su vez con las bibliotecas digitales.

El libro Visibilidad y divulgación de la investigación desde las Humanidades digitales

La obra editada por Álvaro Baraibar: Visibilidad y divulgación de la investigación desde las Humanidades digitales. Experiencias y proyectos (2014),  publicada en Pamplona, por el Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra en la colección BIADIG (Biblioteca Áurea Digital), 22 aborda estas cuatro realidades relacionadas.

Nuevas tecnologías

El trabajo del Grupo de Investigación Siglo de Oro (GRISO) en este libro se centra en cómo las nuevas tecnologías sirven para visibilizar y difundir los resultados de investigación. Los nuevos ámbitos incluyen la comunicación, la biblioteconomía, la archivística, la curación de contenidos, la gestión cultural y la gestión del conocimiento. Y lo hace centrándose en las Humanidades y la trans-disciplinariedad, cada vez más importante para la labor investigadora universitaria. Hablamos de las Humanidades Digitales. [Acceso al libro descargable]

Recursos para una tesis sobre retail y redes sociales

Range.me

Recursos para una tesis sobre fotografía

A este vídeo me refería para el #TFG de #fotografía de Susana @universidadCJC https://t.co/SPLZbAxi67

— OlgaG Ph.D. (@olgag) March 29, 2016